Analisis Transitivitas pada Teks UUD 1945 sebelum Amendemen
Analysis Transitivity the Text of Constitution 1945 before Amendment
Authors | ||
Issue | Vol 3 No 3 (2020): Talenta Conference Series: Local Wisdom, Social, and Arts (LWSA) | |
Section | Articles | |
Section |
Copyright (c) 2020 Talenta Publisher This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
|
Galley | ||
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.32734/lwsa.v3i2.883 | |
Keywords: | Linguistik Sistemik Transivitas Hubungan Logis Semantik Metafora | |
Published | 2020-10-15 |
Abstract
Terelaisasinya teks UUD 1945 menjadi sejarah lahirnya konsitusi pertama di Negara Indonesia. Teks UUD 1945 kemudian diamandemaen sebanyak empat kali. Amandemen pertama pada tahun 1999. Amandemen kedua pada 2000. Amandemen ketiga pada tahun 2001. Amandenmen keempat pada tahun 2002. Setiap amandemen terjadi perubahan pada bagian isi, tetapi tidak pada bagian pembukaaan. Teks UUD 1945 menjadi alat membagikan atau memaparkan pengalaman kepada orang lain. Makna pengalaman tersebut direalisasikan di dalam teks UUD 1945. Ada pun tujuan penelitian ini, yaitu untuk mendeskripsikan makna pengalaman yang berada di dalam teks UUD 1945. Data penelitian ini berupa teks UUD 1945 yang belum diamandemen karena bersifat mendasar dan pertama. Teori yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah teori Linguistik Sistemik Fungsional (LSF) yang dipelopori oleh Halliday. Selanjutnya untuk menganalisis data digunakan teknik analisis model Miles, Huberman, dan Saldana. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ditemukan, yaitu (1) terdapat enam proses di dalam teks Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 yang didominasi oleh proses material (2) terdapat tiga jenis partisisipan, yaitu partisipan berdasarkan prosesnya, partisipan berdasarkan jumlahnya, dan partisipan berdasarkan wujudnya (3) terdapat sepuluh jenis sirkumstan yang didominasi oleh sirkumstan cara dan tidak terdapat sirkumstan rentang waktu. Hal ini menujukkan bahwa teks UUD 1945 pada umunnya dibangun oleh verba material bersamaan sirkumstan cara dan sirkumstan pandangan, serta partisipan terlibat adalah manusia. Teks UUD setelah amendemen sangatlah penting untuk dianalisis dengan pendekatan-pendekatan ilmu bahasa untuk mendeskripsikan teks UUD lebih jelas dan lebih spesifik.
The realization of the text of the 1945 Constitution became the history of the birth of the first constitution in the State of Indonesia. The 1945 Constitution text was then amended four times. The first amendment was in 1999. The second amendment was in 2000. The third amendment was in 2001. The fourth amendment was in 2002. Every amendment occurred in the contents section, but not in the opening section. The 1945 Constitution text is a tool for sharing or describing experiences with others. The meaning of the experience is realized in the text of the 1945 Constitution. There is also the purpose of this research, which is to describe the meaning of experience that is in the text of the 1945 Constitution. This research data is in the form of the 1945 Constitution text which has not been amended because it is fundamental and first. The theory used in this study is the Functional Systemic Linguistics (LSF) theory pioneered by Halliday. Furthermore, to analyze the data used the analysis technique of the model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldana. Based on the results of the study found, namely (1) there are six processes in the text of the 1945 Constitution which are dominated by material processes (2) there are three types of participant, namely participants based on the process, participants based on their numbers, and participants based on their form (3) there are The ten types of circumstant are dominated by circumumstan manner and there is no circumstant extent. It is intended that the text of the 1945 Constitution is generally constructed by a material verb along with a circumstance manner and cirscumstant angle, the participants of which are human beings. The Constitution text after the amendment is very important to be analyzed with linguistic approaches to describe the text of the Constitution more clearly and more specifically.