Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

Antonomasia In Hate Speech

Authors
  • Elza Leyli Lisnora Saragih Universitas HKBP Nommensen , Medan-Pematang Siantar, Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
  • Tiarma Intan Marpaung Doctoral Program Student of Universitas Sumatera Utara
Issue       Vol 4 No 2 (2021): Talenta Conference Series: Local Wisdom, Social, and Arts (LWSA)
Section       Articles
Section      

Copyright (c) 2021 Talenta Conference Series: Local Wisdom, Social and Arts (LWSA)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Galley      
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32734/lwsa.v4i2.1202
Keywords: hate speech antonomasia form and meaning
Published 2021-09-30

Abstract

This study deals with the usage, kinds and meaning of antonomasia in hate speech of netizen to political figures in social media. And the purpose of the study is to describe the using, kinds and meaning of antonomasia in the hate speech. The data is taken from written comments of netizen in some social media such as instagram, twitter, facebook, line, whatsApp and youtube in period of time year 2018 to 2019.This study uses descriptive design. The method of collecting data is documentation then analyzed by using descriptive qualitative design. The types of antonomasia found in the study are metonymic and metaphoric antonomasia. The usage of antonomasia comes from things, historical, animals and another literature. The forms of antonomasia are adjectival, substantial, and relative antonomasia. The netizen uses antonomasia to give a concrete opinion towards abstract things to emphasize someone’s signature in a negative meaning.