Analisis Keseimbangan Lintasan Produksi Ragum Pada PT. XYZ
| Authors | ||
| Issue | Vol 5 No 2 (2022): Talenta Conference Series: Energy and Engineering (EE) | |
| Section | Articles | |
| Section |
Copyright (c) 2022 Talenta Conference Series: Energy and Engineering (EE)  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. |
|
| Galley | ||
| DOI: | https://doi.org/10.32734/ee.v5i2.1548 | |
| Keywords: | Keseimbangan Lintasan Helgeson-Birnie Software WinQSB Line Balancing | |
| Published | 2022-12-13 |
Abstract
Dalam dunia industri, perusahaan industri di Indonesia berusaha untuk mengambil tindakan dan membangun sistem perusahaan untuk bersaing. Proses penyeimbangan lini ini sangat penting dalam perencanaan produksi. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk merancang penyeimbangan lini dan analisis penentuan workcenter yang akan dilakukan secara manual atau menggunakan software WinQSB. Diperoleh bahwa jumlah work center pada perakitan dengan menggunakan metode Helgeson dan Birnie adalah 19 workcenter sedangkan dengan software WinQsb adalah 18 workcenter. Metode Helgeson dan Birnie menghasilkan balance delay 13,568%, efisiensi 86,43%, idle time 13,568%, dan smoothing index 1014,45. Pada software WinQsb menghasilkan balance delay 8,46 %, efisiensi 91,23 %, idle time 8,76 %, dan smoothing index 867,97. Dilihat dari lintasan yang digunakan dengan dua metode yang digunakan, yaitu metode Helgeson dan Birnie dan software WinQSB, diperoleh bahwa metode perbaikan dengan software WinQsb memiliki nilai terbaik dengan balance delay, idle time, dan smoothing index terkecil dan efisiensi terbesar.
In the industrial world, industrial companies in Indonesia are trying to take actions that are building a company system in order to compete. This line balancing process is very important in production planning. This research is aiming to design a balancexof productionxlinesxand analysis of work center determination will be carried out either manually or with WinQSB software. It was found that the number of work centers in the assembly using the Helgeson and Birnie methods was 19 work centers while the WinQsb software was 18 work centers. The Helgeson and Birnie method produces a balance delay of 13.568%, efficiency of 86.43%, idle time of 13.568%, and a smoothing index of 1014.45. The WinQSB software produces a balance delay of 8.46 %, efficiency is 91.23 %, idle time is 8.76 %, and smoothing index is 867.97. Judging from the trajectory used with the two methods used, namely the Helgeson and Birnie method and the WinQSB software, it is found that the repair method with the WinQsb software has the best value with the smallest balance delay, idle time, and smoothing index and the greatest efficiency.
